Japan is often seen as a technologically advanced country.
However, when it comes to new ideas and innovation, progress
can feel surprisingly slow. The procedures involved are often complex , time consuming, and discouraging.
This contrast often raises the questions: why does innovation move more slowly in Japan than in other developed countries.
One key reason lies in how regulation works.In Japan rules are often designed to prevent problems before they happen ,rather than to allow experimentation and deal with issues later.
This mindset can be seen clearly in everyday practices.
I once saw a large amount of cash being checked by several bank employees at the same time.
From an efficiency standpoint, this may seem excessive or even irrational.
However, in Japan, this kind of multiple human verification reflects a deep concern about responsibility, error prevention, and institutional trust.
Rather than relying solely on systems, the presence of many eyes serves to distribute responsibility and avoid any single point of failure.
At the same time, this repeated checking culture may also help explain why Japanese manufacturing has earned a reputation for reliability and long-lasting durability.
By prioritizing error prevention and thorough verification, Japanese products often achieve a level of trust that allows them to be used for many years without failure.
When something goes wrong ,responsibility tends to fall heavily on individuals, making people extremely cautious about trying anything new.
Another factor is the strong emphasis on precedent. If there is no clear example of something being done before, approval can be difficult to obtain.
In many cases, doing nothing is seen as safer than taking a risk that might lead to criticism or failure.
Social pressure also plays a role.
In Japan, mistakes are often remembered for a long time , while success may be taken for a granted.
This imbalance makes risk-taking less attractive, especially in large organizations where public image and harmony are highly valued.
Of course , this cautious approach has its strengths .
It helps maintain safety ,reliability ,and high standards of quality.
However ,in a world where speed and adaptability are increasingly important ,excessive caution can become a disadvantage.
Innovation often requires trial and error ,uncertainty ,and the freedom to fail.
The quiet question is whether Japan’s current approach can adapt to a future that demand faster change and greater flexibility.
コメント